MLA 2012—Why Comics Are and Are Not Picture Books

A page from the sublime Gemma Bovery, by Posy Simmonds (1999)  Bouncing Buffalo, by Posy Simmonds (1994)

Session 579. Why Comics Are and Are Not Picture Books

Saturday, 7 January, 5:15–6:30 p.m.

Room 303, Washington State Convention Center

Presiding: Charles Hatfield, California State University, Northridge; Craig Svonkin, Metropolitan State College of Denver

Session jointly arranged by the MLA Division on Children’s Literature and the MLA Discussion Group on Comics and Graphic Narratives

Both picture books and comics participate in children’s culture and literacy learning; both build narratives visually. Yet their kinship is obscured by different ideological frameworks: picture books are generally seen as empowering young readers to take part in a social structure that prizes official literacy; comics, in contrast, are often seen as fugitive reading competing with or obstructing that literacy. Despite this presumed opposition, the two genres share historical antecedents and formal features, most obviously visual/verbal hybridity. Moreover, the creative dialogue between the two has recently intensified: consider comics-like picture books by Sís, Spiegelman, Wiesner, Bang, and Willems; continuing interest in classics like Sendak’s In the Night Kitchen; and recent genre-blurring texts like Tan’s The Arrival and Selznick’s The Invention of Hugo Cabret. This session will encourage a critical conversation to match.

Scholars of the picture book (Nodelman; Spaulding; Nikolajeva & Scott; op de Beeck) have noted the aesthetics and reading demands of comics. Conversely, comics theorists (McCloud; Varnum & Gibbons) have suggested formal likenesses between the genres. Yet the critical dialogue between the two remains muted. Despite connections—including shared aesthetic resources, the relevance of word/image theory to both, and the growing prominence of comics in children’s publishing and reading instruction—the two media are overdue for a critical summit. To that end, this panel unites four scholars who explore the interrelations between the two from a variety of theoretical perspectives.

1. Picture Book Guy Looks at Comics: Structural Differences in Two Kinds of Visual Narrative

Perry Nodelman, University of Winnipeg

Launching the discussion, Perry Nodelman extends the work of his seminal Words about Pictures by considering how reading strategies learned from one genre may confound attempts to read the other. Nodelman discusses the confusion comics may generate for the even the most seasoned picture book interpreter, thus opening the question of how the formal qualities conventional for each genre may differ. He then compares two different works by Michael Nicoll Yahgulanaas, a Haida artist: the comic Red (2009), self-described as a “Haida manga,” and the picture book The Canoe He Called Loo Tas (2010, scripted by Amanda Reid-Stevens). While the images in the two are stylistically similar, the books offer markedly different reading experiences, epitomizing different conventions regarding the fragmentation and multiplication of verbal and visual texts, the separation or intermixture of the verbal and visual, and, finally, expected degrees of interpretive certainty.

2. Not Genres but Modes of Graphic Narrative: Comics and Picture Books

Philip Nel, Kansas State University

Extending Nodelman’s line of inquiry, Philip Nel proposes that picture books and comics are not discrete genres but rather modes—in Northrop Frye’s sense of an “attitude assumed by the poet [or author-artist] toward his audience.” Both of these modes, Nel argues, imply a reader willing to navigate the friction between (in Nelson Goodman’s terms) the continuous, ungraduated picture and the disjunct, graduated word, the former offering a less guided reading experience, the latter a more directed one. Beyond this similarity, the two differ in how they tend to rely on different forms of juxtaposition and transition; however, Nel makes the case that the many exceptions to these tendencies belie any firm distinction between the two modes as “genres.”

3. Graphic Novels’ Assault upon the Republic of Reading

Michael Joseph, Rutgers University, New Brunswick

Building on the question of audience, Michael Joseph posits the graphic novel as a liminal object. Adapting Victor Turner’s concept of liminality—a state of “inbetweenness” marked by the disturbance of established social structures—Joseph reads comics as antagonistic to the norms of book culture and thus critical of the very category of children’s literature. The graphic novel, neither book nor art object in the usual sense, deconstructs the form and utility of the picture book, representing a reading attitude that is critical and subversive—in Althusser’s sense of resisting ideological interpellation into the social structure. Graphic novels do this by inviting an embodied and material reading practice, one which refuses the transparency that convention dictates is essential to the reading experience. The effect is to cede interpretive agency to the reader within the context of the physical act of reading—an empowerment particularly important to readers in the liminal state of adolescence.

4. The Panel as Page and the Page as Panel: Uncle Shelby and the Case of the Twin ABZ Books

Joseph Terry Thomas, Jr., San Diego State University

Our final panelist, Thomas, complements Joseph’s ideological focus by exploring how expectations of genre determine and limit the kinds of meaning we can make of a text; that is, how genre concepts work to shape and foreclose interpretive possibilities. Pursuing Samuel Delany’s critique of rigid genre definitions, Thomas examines two different versions of the controversial Uncle Shelby ABZ Book (1961), a work by poet-cartoonist Shel Silverstein that initially appeared as a comic strip in Playboy but soon after was reformatted and redrawn as a picture book. Thomas uses these different instantiations of the same text to explore how preconceptions of genre—in this case, comic or picture book—determine our relationship with that text, diminishing certain understandings while emphasizing others.

Taken together, these papers promise to spark intense discussion of important formal and ideological relations between picture books and comics. At a time when comics reading is at last being studied for its role in cognitive growth and educational attainment—concerns central to MLA 2012’s Presidential theme Language, Literature, Learning—and a time when comics and picture books are struggling to respond to social and technological change, this panel will test the boundaries that have traditionally divided these two media.

4 Responses to MLA 2012—Why Comics Are and Are Not Picture Books

  1. Kathy Kaulbach says:

    I am a designer / illustrator / MA Ed student with a deep interest in graphic novels, picturebooks, and visual communication, unfortunately I don’t live in Seattle. Any chance that these papers or a video of the discussion will be posted on line?

    • charleshatfield says:

      Kathy, thank you kindly for your interest!

      Unfortunately, we can’t make official plans for recording the talks. That is to say, there is no provision for recording most MLA panels. Some papers or panels may be recorded in audio or video by individual participants, but that’s not something people generally expect, nor something the MLA offers as a matter of course.

      As for PAPERS coming out of the conference, that’s hard to predict, but, YES, generally the expectation (the hope!) is that somewhere down the road these papers will be published, usually in substantially revised and expanded form. Sometimes that takes years. I can tell you that some of this year’s presenters already have publication plans. I expect the picturebook/comics panel, for instance, to yield publications within the coming year, but it’s too soon for me to say where or how.

      Very often, participants in conferences like the MLA use the occasion as an incentive to write what they hope will become the kernel of a journal article or book chapter. Having the conference as a deadline, and the opportunity to get smart feedback from listeners at the conference, often prompts us to start or extend larger writing projects. What this means (and I’m betting you already know this) is that conference presenters often have future plans, proprietary plans, for the papers they’re giving. Which means that conferences usually don’t make plans for the “afterlife” of the papers; rather, the individual presenters do.

      There are exceptions to this—for instance, when conference organizers set out to publish a proceedings volume based on what actually happened at the conference—but in general it is the individual authors who decide whether and how to pursue publication for their work. The eventual published results are usually greatly refined, and extended, compared to what gets delivered at the conference.

      Sorry, this response seems a bit pedantic to me. But I just wanted to assure you, and other readers, that there WILL be publications and other tangible results coming out of this conference—it’s just that they may be some time in coming, and will probably be scattered through various books and journals.

      We of the MLA Comics and Graphic Narratives Group will post a brief report about the conference after it’s done, in, mid to late January. But we all hope to be reading the “yield” of the conference for years to come!

  2. Kathy Kaulbach says:

    Thanks so much for the information, pedantic was fine. I am just beginning the part of my life that I define myself as “academic” and living on the edge of the north Atlantic is somewhat problematic. I regularly bless the www. Thanks again, I will keep my eyes scanning for future information.

  3. charleshatfield says:

    Thank you, Kathy! I hope you find our site of use.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: